tag on profile.
Chinese or Singapore systems promote political meritocracy from the grass root level and their systemic legitimacy comes from result oriented performa
Leave a comment for the team.
Subscribe to this research.
Join us on the latest researches that matter.
How It Works
Follow & Join.
With more and more following, the research starts attracting best of the coordinators and experts.
Build a Team
Coordinators build a team with experts to pick up the execution. Start building a plan.
Fix the issue.
The team works transparently and systematically fixing the issue, building the leaders of tomorrow.
How can you make a difference?
Do you care about this issue? Do You think a concrete action should be taken?Then Follow and Support this Research Action Group.Following will not only keep you updated on the latest, help voicing your opinions, and inspire our Coordinators & Experts. But will get you priority on our study tours, events, seminars, panels, courses and a lot more on the subject and beyond.
Communities and Nations where citizens spend time exploring and nurturing their culture, processes, civil liberties and responsibilities. Have a well-researched voice on issues of systemic importance, are the one which flourish to become beacon of light for the world.
Share it across your social networks.
Every small step counts, share it across your friends and networks. You never know, the issue you care about, might find a champion.
Got few hours a week to do public good ?
Join the Research Action Group as a member or expert, work with right team and get funded. To know more contact a Coordinator with a little bit of details on your expertise and experiences.
Know someone who can help?
Invite by emails.
- Email This Research
- Share on
By
Rakesh Prasad 33
Chinese or Singapore systems promote political meritocracy from the grass root level and their systemic legitimacy comes from result oriented performance and is less dependent to derive it from popular outcome of universal suffrage .
In India, whoever holds majority, current or last ruling party, the debates always drift towards winners are right and losers are wrong (since we have more seats) and many times the merit of arguments are shadowed by a supposed popular wins every 5 year.
Our current parliament logjams, long list or bills pending, slow reforms, short term populism and related wastage replacing long term planning are making it very important to look for political system reform.
We should believe in our current one head one vote format to keep the rulers in check (which is a problem seen in Chinese and Singapore systems), but the pool to select from should be very meritocratic and evaluated independently.