tag on profile.
The Curious Case of Gurgaon’s 24‑Meter and 30‑Meter Roads: A Civic Tech Founder’s Field Note
Urban India loves grand narratives — expressways, metro lines, and skyline‑defining projects. But the real story of a city’s governance capacity is often hidden in its smallest connective tissues: the internal sector roads that determine whether neighbourhoods function as cohesive urban units or remain fragmented islands.
Few examples illustrate this better than the long‑pending 24‑metre and 30‑metre sector roads across Gurgaon’s new sectors. These roads were meant to be the backbone connecting residential clusters to trunk networks like the Dwarka Expressway. Yet, nearly 17 years after the 2008 Master Plan, many of these stretches remain incomplete, encroached, or simply uninitiated.
The result is a paradox: world‑class condominiums surrounded by what residents often describe as “wildlife safari” access roads.
A Master Plan That Outpaced Its Execution
The Gurugram Master Plan 2021, later extended to 2035, laid out a clear hierarchy of roads to support the explosive residential growth that developers marketed aggressively in the 2008–2012 period. Families moved in. Societies flourished. But the connective infrastructure lagged far behind.
Many internal roads remain incomplete due to non‑acquisition of small but critical land parcels, leaving entire sectors dependent on narrow village revenue roads for daily access. The consequences are predictable:
- Broken drainage networks
- Incomplete garbage and sanitation systems
- Fragmented public spaces
- Delayed civic services
- Safety and mobility challenges
All of this stands in stark contrast to the “Millennium City” branding and the presence of powerful civic bodies like GMDA, HSVP, MCG, and central agencies.
Policy Drift and Administrative Ambiguity
One of the most striking aspects of this issue is the policy drift. Over the years, the land acquisition and R&R frameworks for these roads have changed multiple times.
From building a nodal agency per sector with city admins like GMDA, MCG, HSVP, DHBVN etc. and sector developers i.e. builder participation, to new R&R FAR portability-based policy, but nothing really impacting the ground situation.
The result is a governance vacuum where no single agency feels fully accountable.
In 2019, during one of my visits to the DTP office with approved maps in hand, an officer joked, “We only draw maps.” The official communication from Panchkula redirected us to an HSVP office that had no XEN posted for months. This is not negligence — it is structural ambiguity.
Even recent government statements acknowledge the problem. Officials from GMDA, HSVP, and TCP have publicly stated that resolving this requires policy‑level changes, including clearer rights over roads and public facilities at the approval stage.
The Limits of Civic Engagement
Over the years, we as curious civic solutions systems founder have tried every democratic channel available:
- Petitions through RWAs and civic forums
- CM Window and PMO submissions
- Direct engagement with DTP and HSVP
- Requests to local representatives
- Media coverage
- NGO collaborations
- MLAs raising this matter in house.
- MLAs, MPs heavily campaigning around the matter during elections.
Yet, the silence from the machinery has been deafening.
Even when we attempted to mobilize our RWA to file a writ petition — often the only way to compel administrative response — the internal politics of term‑bound RWAs made consensus nearly impossible. RWAs, despite being closest to the problem, are often caught between resident expectations, political alignments, and fear of confrontation.
Journalists periodically revisit the issue, but without administrative traction, stories fade into the background noise of urban India.
The Deeper Structural Hypotheses Behind the Delays
When a master‑planned road network remains stuck for over a decade, it’s rarely due to a single cause. From a civic‑solutions observer’s lens, several systemic hypotheses emerge since last 17 years watching it, not as accusations, but as frameworks to understand why such projects stall in India’s urban peripheries.
1. Inter‑regime discontinuity
Every new political or administrative cycle inherits the previous master plan’s commitments. Sometimes, legacy plans are deprioritized simply because they were conceived under a different leadership. Momentum quietly evaporates.
2. Incentive misalignment in land economics
When land values rise exponentially, delays can become economically advantageous for certain stakeholders. Even small pauses can create arbitrage opportunities — not necessarily due to collusion, but because the system rewards incremental land‑value jumps more than timely public‑infrastructure delivery.
3. Fragmented landholding patterns
In peri‑urban India, land parcels are often split across extended families, caste clusters, and micro‑communities. Any R&R process becomes a negotiation across dozens of micro‑interests. Even one unresolved parcel can stall an entire 2‑km stretch.
4. Caste‑based negotiation dynamics
Compensation and acquisition negotiations are influenced by local social hierarchies. When different groups perceive unequal benefits or historical grievances, negotiations can stretch for years.
5. Civic‑society fatigue cycles
Residents mobilize intensely when pain peaks, then settle once a temporary bypass or kaccha road appears. This cyclical activism reduces sustained pressure on agencies.
6. Developer churn and legacy liabilities
The 2008–2012 builder cohort sold aggressively, exited, or went dormant. Their projects now depend on public roads that were never fully executed. Meanwhile, a new generation of developers is active, creating overlapping expectations and competing priorities.
7. Multi‑agency governance without a single owner
GMDA, HSVP, MCG, HSAMB, DHBVN, the Irrigation Department — each controls a piece of the puzzle. Without a unified command structure, even small decisions require multi‑department alignment.
8. Premature publication of master‑plan maps
Publishing road alignments before securing land created a speculative frenzy. Once land prices rose, acquisition became exponentially harder — a classic planning‑sequence error.
9. Localized bursts of excitement around new projects
Whenever a new builder launches a project or a stalled one restarts, local enthusiasm spikes. But these bursts rarely translate into sustained pressure for systemic road completion.
10. The “everyone’s problem, no one’s mandate” paradox
Sector roads sit at the intersection of public purpose, private benefit, and administrative responsibility. When accountability is diffused, delays become normalized.
A Case Study Waiting for Academia
The saga of Gurgaon’s 24m/30m roads is not merely an infrastructure story — it is a living laboratory for students of public policy, urban governance, and civic technology.
It raises fundamental questions:
- How do master plans fail despite clear documentation?
- What happens when multi‑agency governance lacks a single point of accountability?
- How do land economics distort public infrastructure timelines?
- Why do citizen‑led initiatives struggle despite digital tools and democratic channels?
- What institutional reforms are needed to prevent such failures in future cities?
This is a PhD‑level case study waiting to be documented. Universities should send their brightest scholars to map this ecosystem, interview stakeholders, and produce actionable frameworks that civic society can use — sector by sector.
Conclusion: The Road Ahead
As a civic‑tech founder, I see this not as a story of failure but as a call to innovate. Technology can help map land parcels, track accountability, crowdsource citizen evidence, and create transparent dashboards. But technology alone cannot fix structural ambiguity.
What Gurgaon needs is a unified, time‑bound, publicly monitored execution framework for internal sector roads — one that aligns incentives across agencies, developers, and citizens.
Until then, the 24m and 30m roads will remain more than missing infrastructure — they will remain symbols of the gap between India’s urban aspirations and its administrative realities.
