Sudharsana Iyengar
46 rep
@COP21 - India Sets a cost of 2.5 Trillion Dollars just to maintain our carbon emission rates by 2030- Is it realistic with our inefficiencies.
Parliament House(New Delhi--110001)
4 members
4 milestones
▲ 1
5 views · 7d
249 all-time
What you're looking at · a pilot performance-analytics framework
BallotBoxIndia treats a district's development like a shared fund, and every socio-political innovator — leader, NGO, business, expert, journalist, activist — like a contributor whose impact we try to measure. The scores here are an experiment to tell apart what an innovator actually moved (नेता का हाथ · their real contribution) from what circumstance carried (हालात · the wave).
Contribution ≈ Alpha
Circumstance ≈ Beta
Experimental · community-verified
About this research
On 1 October 2015, India submitted its Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC), including the targets to lower the emissions intensity of GDP by 33% to 35% by 2030 below 2005 levels, to increase the share of non-fossil based power generation capacity to 40% of installed electric power capacity by 2030 (equivalent to 26–30% of generation in 2030), and to create an additional (cumulative) carbon sink of 2.5–3 GtCO2e through additional forest and tree cover by 2030. For 2020, India has earlier put forward a pledge to reduce the emissions intensity of GDP by 20% to 25% by 2020 below 2005 levels. We rate the Indian INDC as “medium”.
Source :- http://climateactiontracker.org/
With this Action Group we are going to track on its details and find out if the cost to tax payer (as of now most of the $2.5 Trillions) is going to be a patch, over inefficiencies like
And many more...
Are we going to plug the leakage in our system or will keep burning tax payers money in the self re-enforcing cycle of expensive patch works and lipstick on pig strategy all around. Just going after a set of renewable methods at very high cost of generation and carbon sinks, without plugging these gaping holes in the way we run our economy, will just negate all the efforts and money in the end.
Any effort to avert climate change needs radical change in the thought process and definition of what we mean by development.
Is it all about a set of numbers which our communities keep chasing as parameter of development, Or these numbers are derived from how prosperous, sustainable and cohesive communities are.
Keep an eye on this space for more.
Thanks
Contributors
People moving this research forward. Reputation accrues to whoever moves each milestone.
Updates & discussions
संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ के प्रमुख ने वैश्विक जलवायु परिवर्तन और हिंसक संघर्षों पर जताई चिंता
नकारने से और नासूर बन जाएगी मौसम परिवर्तन की समस्या
Hello everyone,Personally, I find this is achievable. I know that this action group is started to check if the goals are reached. I am going to talk a
हिंडन को जाने: भाग-1 - हिंडन की देह
How this page is edited — our standards
BallotBoxIndia is an AI-assisted pilot. Content here is reviewed by an editorial process against open, public journalistic standards and checked by human editors before it is featured. Every page is assessed for:
- Verification — claims backed by public sources
- Accuracy — names, dates and numbers checked
- Fairness & neutrality — balanced, non-partisan, with a right of reply
- Public interest — real development & governance, not promotion
- Timeliness — current, with a last-reviewed date
- Completeness — the actual substance, not filler
- Transparency — sources, authorship and AI-assistance disclosed
Figures and generated text are pilot estimates and may contain errors. If something here is wrong or unfair, we honour corrections and right of reply — contact editors@ballotboxindia.com.
Working on this issue?
Join as a member or expert, add a milestone, and be credited for the work. No money changes hands — the currency is your effort and analysis.
Join this research →